Ultrasound-Assisted Niosome Production for Nanomedicine
Niosomes are nonionic surfactant–based vesicular systems that have gained increasing attention as versatile carriers for bioactive compounds and pharmaceutical agents. Their ability to encapsulate both hydrophilic and lipophilic molecules, combined with favorable biocompatibility and stability, makes them attractive alternatives to liposomes. Ultrasonication plays a central role in the formation and optimization of niosomes, particularly in controlling vesicle size, lamellarity, and encapsulation efficiency.
Niosomes – Improved Formation and Encapsulation with Sonication
Niosomes are vesicular nanocarriers composed primarily of nonionic surfactants (e.g., Span®, Tween®) and cholesterol, which self-assemble into bilayered structures upon hydration. During conventional thin-film hydration, multilamellar vesicles are initially formed, typically exhibiting broad size distributions and limited reproducibility. Ultrasonication is therefore widely applied as a post-formation step to refine vesicle characteristics.
Sonication introduces high-energy acoustic cavitation, generating localized shear forces and microjets that fragment large multilamellar vesicles into smaller, more uniform unilamellar or oligolamellar structures. Multiple studies have demonstrated that probe-type sonication significantly reduces mean particle size into the nanoscale range (typically 150–300 nm) while lowering polydispersity indices below 0.3, indicating improved homogeneity.
Beyond size control, sonication enhances encapsulation efficiency (EE) by improving drug distribution within the bilayer or aqueous core. Lipophilic compounds such as simvastatin, artemisone, and curcumin preferentially partition into the surfactant bilayer, while hydrophilic drugs such as ceftizoxime localize in the aqueous compartments. Optimized sonication times (commonly 4–7 minutes) have been shown to yield EE values exceeding 75–95%, depending on surfactant composition and cholesterol ratio.
Niosomes prepared by sonication with the UP400St
Niosomes: Applications in Pharma and Cosmetics
The pharmaceutical relevance of sonicated niosomes is well established across multiple therapeutic areas. In antimicrobial therapy, niosomal encapsulation markedly enhances the efficacy of antibiotics and natural antimicrobials against resistant pathogens. For example, coencapsulation of ceftizoxime and curcumin into niosomes resulted in more than a 64-fold reduction in minimum inhibitory concentrations against multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Klebsiella pneumoniae, alongside sustained drug release over 72 hours.
In oncology, niosomes have been shown to improve the therapeutic index of poorly soluble anticancer agents. Artemisoneloaded niosomes exhibited significantly enhanced cytotoxicity toward melanoma cells while reducing toxicity toward normal keratinocytes, a benefit attributed to controlled release and vesiclemediated cellular uptake.
In cosmetic and dermatological applications, niosomes are particularly valuable for topical delivery. Encapsulation of Withania somnifera extracts into niosomes improved skin penetration, protected sensitive phytochemicals from degradation, and enabled controlled release into specific skin layers, supporting applications in antiaging and dermal therapy.
Collectively, these studies demonstrate that ultrasonically optimized niosomes enhance bioavailability, stability, and therapeutic performance across pharmaceutical and cosmetic domains.
Advantages of Probe-Type Sonicators over Ultrasonic Baths for Niosome Production
Although both probe-type and bath-type sonicators rely on acoustic cavitation, they are fundamentally different devices with markedly different performance capabilities. Ultrasonic baths are primarily designed for cleaning and degassing applications, whereas probe-type sonicators function as high-performance homogenizers and therefore offer decisive advantages for efficient and controlled niosome fabrication.
Probe sonicators deliver acoustic energy directly into the sample, resulting in significantly higher power density and more efficient cavitation. This leads to faster vesicle size reduction, improved reproducibility, and superior control over final particle characteristics.
Experimental comparisons indicate that probe sonication achieves smaller vesicle sizes and higher encapsulation efficiencies within minutes, whereas ultrasonic baths often require prolonged exposure and still yield broader size distributions. Furthermore, probe systems allow precise adjustment of amplitude, pulse cycles, and energy input, which is critical for scaling and process optimization.
Another key advantage is consistency. Probetype sonicators minimize batchtobatch variability, a crucial factor for pharmaceutical manufacturing and regulatory compliance. As demonstrated in multiple studies employing Hielscher ultrasonic processors, probe sonication reliably produces nanoscale niosomes with narrow polydispersity and high stability.
Exemplary Step-by-Step Instruction
The following generalized protocol synthesizes best practices reported across the cited studies:
- Preparation of Organic Phase
Dissolve the selected nonionic surfactant(s) (e.g., Span 60, Tween 60), cholesterol, and lipophilic drug or bioactive compound in a volatile organic solvent such as chloroform or a chloroform–methanol mixture. - Thin-Film Formation
Remove the solvent under reduced pressure using a rotary evaporator at elevated temperature (≈60 °C) to form a uniform thin lipid film on the flask wall. - Hydration
Hydrate the dried film with an aqueous phase (e.g., phosphate-buffered saline) containing hydrophilic drugs if applicable, under controlled temperature and stirring to produce multilamellar vesicles. - Sonication
Subject the dispersion to probe-type ultrasonication (e.g., 50–200 W, pulsed mode) for 5–7 minutes while cooling to prevent overheating. This step reduces vesicle size and improves encapsulation. - Purification and Characterization
Remove unencapsulated drug via centrifugation or ultrafiltration. Characterize size, polydispersity, zeta potential, and encapsulation efficiency using DLS, TEM, and spectroscopic methods.
This workflow has been successfully applied for antibiotics, anticancer agents, and phytochemicals, yielding stable nanoscale niosomes with high performance.
Get a Sonicator to Make Superior Niosomes!
Ultrasonication is a critical enabling technology for the efficient formation of niosomes and the high-performance encapsulation of drugs and bioactive compounds. Hielscher sonicators allow for superior control over vesicle size, uniformity, and encapsulation efficiency. Evidence from antimicrobial, anticancer, and topical delivery studies consistently demonstrates that ultrasonically optimized niosomes enhance bioavailability, therapeutic efficacy, and stability while reducing toxicity. As formulation science advances toward scalable and reproducible nanocarrier systems, ultrasonic niosome production represents a robust and industrially relevant platform for pharmaceutical and cosmetic applications.
The table below gives you an indication of the approximate processing capacity of our ultrasonicators:
| Batch Volume | Flow Rate | Recommended Devices |
|---|---|---|
| 1 to 500mL | 10 to 200mL/min | UP100H |
| 10 to 2000mL | 20 to 400mL/min | UP200Ht, UP400St |
| 0.1 to 20L | 0.2 to 4L/min | UIP2000hdT |
| 10 to 100L | 2 to 10L/min | UIP4000hdT |
| 15 to 150L | 3 to 15L/min | UIP6000hdT |
| n.a. | 10 to 100L/min | UIP16000hdT |
| n.a. | larger | cluster of UIP16000hdT |
Design, Manufacturing and Consulting – Quality Made in Germany
Hielscher ultrasonicators are well-known for their highest quality and design standards. Robustness and easy operation allow the smooth integration of our ultrasonicators into industrial facilities. Rough conditions and demanding environments are easily handled by Hielscher ultrasonicators.
Hielscher Ultrasonics is an ISO certified company and put special emphasis on high-performance ultrasonicators featuring state-of-the-art technology and user-friendliness. Of course, Hielscher ultrasonicators are CE compliant and meet the requirements of UL, CSA and RoHs.
Sonicator UP200St with sonotrode S26d7D and flow cell FC7GK for the inline preparation of niosomes
Literature / References
- Asalipisheh, A., Ashrafi, F., Ghane, M. et al. (2025): Enhanced antibacterial activity of 3D-printed niosome-curcumin/ceftizoxime scaffolds against drug-resistant pathogens. BMC Microbiol 25, 650 (2025).
- Anupma Dwivedi, Anisha Mazumder, Lissinda du Plessis, Jan L. du Preez, Richard K. Haynes, Jeanetta du Plessis (2015): In vitro anti-cancer effects of artemisone nano-vesicular formulations on melanoma cells. Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology and Medicine, Volume 11, Issue 8, 2015. 2041-2050.
- Akbarzadeh I., Keramati M., Azadi A., Afzali E., Shahbazi R., Chiani M., Norouzian D., Bakhshandeh H. (2021): Optimization, physicochemical characterization, and antimicrobial activity of a novel simvastatin nano-niosomal gel against E. coli and S. aureus. Chem Phys Lipids. 2021 Jan;234:105019.
- Chinembiri T.N., Gerber M., du Plessis L.H., du Preez J.L., Hamman J.H., du Plessis J. (2017): Topical Delivery of Withania somnifera Crude Extracts in Niosomes and Solid Lipid Nanoparticles. Pharmacognosy Magazine 2017 Oct;13 (Suppl 3):S663-S671.
Frequently Asked Questions
What are Niosomes?
Niosomes are nanoscale vesicular drug delivery systems composed of non-ionic surfactants and cholesterol that self-assemble into bilayer structures capable of encapsulating both hydrophilic compounds in their aqueous core and lipophilic compounds within the bilayer. They are used to improve the stability, bioavailability, controlled release, and targeted delivery of drugs and bioactive molecules.
What is the Difference between Niosomes and Liposomes?
The primary difference between niosomes and liposomes lies in their membrane composition: niosomes are formed from non-ionic surfactants, whereas liposomes are composed mainly of phospholipids. As a result, niosomes generally exhibit higher chemical stability, lower production cost, and improved shelf life compared to liposomes, while liposomes more closely mimic biological membranes and are often considered more biocompatible but are prone to oxidative degradation and higher formulation costs.
What are the Most Common Nanocarriers?
The most common nanocarriers used in drug and bioactive compound delivery include liposomes, niosomes, polymeric nanoparticles, solid lipid nanoparticles, nanostructured lipid carriers, nanoemulsions, micelles, dendrimers, and inorganic nanoparticles, each offering distinct advantages in terms of loading capacity, release behavior, stability, and targeting potential.
Hielscher Ultrasonics manufactures high-performance ultrasonic homogenizers from lab to industrial size.
