Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) Assay Protocol
The Biofilm-Based Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) assay is an essential method for evaluating the effectiveness of antimicrobial agents against biofilm-associated microorganisms, which exhibit heightened resistance due to their protective extracellular matrix. A crucial step in this assay is the disruption of biofilm structures to release embedded cells for accurate viability assessment. The UIP400MTP multi-well plate sonicator facilitates this process by employing focused ultrasound to generate controlled cavitation, efficiently detaching biofilm cells and dispersing them into a uniform suspension. This precise and reproducible biofilm disruption enhances the reliability and throughput of MIC assays, making the UIP400MTP an essential tool in advancing biofilm research.
Sonication for Biofilm Detachment
The Biofilm-Based MIC Assay typically measures bacterial viability or growth inhibition using methods such as plating, colony counting, or optical density measurements. Sonication is a critical step in biofilm-based MIC assays when assessing the antimicrobial susceptibility of biofilm-associated microorganisms. Its primary function is to detach and disperse cells embedded in the biofilm matrix into a uniform suspension for accurate analysis.
Biofilms are significantly more resistant to antimicrobial agents compared to planktonic cells, making proper detachment critical for accurate analysis. During this process, ultrasonic waves generate controlled cavitation, breaking apart the biofilm matrix and releasing embedded cells into a uniform suspension within the recovery medium. This step enables precise viability assessments of biofilm-dispersed cells through methods such as plating, dilution, and colony counting. Proper biofilm disruption via sonication prevents residual matrix components from shielding cells, which could otherwise lead to an underestimation of antimicrobial activity. The multi-well plate sonicator UIP400MTP is particularly well-suited for this purpose, offering precise and reproducible sonication conditions to ensure reliable and high-throughput preparation of assay plates.

UIP400MTP microplate sonicator for precisely controllable biofilm detachment in MIC and MBEC assays.
Why Sonication is Necessary in Biofilm-Based Minimum Inhibitrory Concentration Assays
For viability measurements and cell counting, a complete and reliable detachment and dispersion of single cells is required. The UIP400MTP promotes a uniform, non-damaging biofilm detachment and cell dispersion for robust assay results.
- Biofilm Complexity: Biofilms are structured microbial communities encased in an extracellular polymeric substance (EPS) matrix, which protects the microorganisms and makes them more resistant to antimicrobial agents.
- Uniform Dispersion: To accurately measure the viability of biofilm-embedded cells or their susceptibility to antimicrobials, the biofilm must first be dislodged and broken down into a homogeneous suspension.
Biofilm-Based Minimum Inhibitory Concentration Assay Protocol
The Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) assay determines the lowest concentration of an antimicrobial agent required to inhibit the visible growth of microorganisms. This protocol is designed for biofilm-associated microorganisms, using UIP400MTP multi-well plate sonicator for biofilm disruption.
Step 1: Preparation of Bacterial Inoculum
- Prepare the bacterial suspension:
Grow bacteria in appropriate media to the mid-logarithmic phase.
Dilute the culture to achieve a standardized cell density (e.g., 0.5 McFarland standard or OD600 ~0.1). - Prepare antimicrobial solutions:
Dilute the antimicrobial agent in a suitable medium to create a range of concentrations (e.g., twofold serial dilutions). - Dispense into the 96well plate:
Add the antimicrobial solutions into the wells of a standard 96-well plate, with a final well volume of ~150–200 µL.
Include growth controls (no antimicrobial) and sterility controls (no bacterial inoculum).
Step 2: Biofilm Formation on Peg Lid
- Attach the peg lid:
Place the specialized peg lid onto the inoculated wells, ensuring the pegs are fully submerged in the bacterial suspension. - Incubate the plate:
Incubate at the appropriate temperature (e.g., 37°C) for a specified duration (e.g., 24 hours) under static conditions to allow biofilm formation on the pegs. - Rinse the pegs:
Remove the peg lid from the bacterial suspension and gently rinse in sterile saline or PBS to remove loosely attached planktonic cells. - Expose to antimicrobials:
Transfer the peg lid into a new 96well plate containing the antimicrobial dilutions prepared earlier.
Incubate for a defined period (e.g., 24 hours) under static conditions to allow the antimicrobial agent to act on the biofilms.
Step 3: Antimicrobial Exposure

Multi-well plate sonicator UIP400MTP for high-throughput sample preparation
Step 4: Sonication with the Microplate Sonicator UIP400MTP
The sonication step is critical for detaching biofilms from the peg lids to assess viability. Follow these steps for the UIP400MTP sonicator:
- Prepare the setup:
Fill a fresh 96-well plate with recovery medium (e.g., neutralizing broth or sterile growth medium) in each well. - Transfer the peg lid:
Remove the peg lid from the antimicrobial treatment plate.
Rinse the peg lid in sterile saline or PBS to remove residual antimicrobial agents. - Position the plate in the sonicator:
Attach the peg lid to the recovery medium plate.
Place the recovery medium plate into the UIP400MTP sonicator, ensuring the plate sits centered and stable as in the manual described. - Adjust sonication parameters:
Set the sonication parameters at the UIP400MTP (settings may be adjusted to the biofilm):
Amplitude: 70–100%.
Sonication time: 1–3 minutes (adjust based on biofilm structure) at cycle mode. - Sonicate:
Start the sonication process. The ultrasonic waves will disrupt the biofilm matrix and dislodge the cells into the recovery medium. - Monitor the process:
Use the pluggable temperature sensor to monitor the sample temperature in the wells. The UIP400MTP can be connected to a lab chiller for cooling. - Post-sonication handling:
Immediately transfer the recovery medium containing detached biofilms into a fresh sterile plate for subsequent analysis.

(A) Plate containing TSB with 2% glucose used for biofilm formation, cell recovery, and determination of MIC and MBEC; (B) Lid with pins for formation of staphylococcal biofilms.
The biofilm cells formed on the pins were dislodged by sonication (Hielscher Ultrasound Technology) for 5 min in 96-well plates containing fresh culture medium for recovery of the cells.
(Picture and study: ©de Oliveira et al., 2016)
Step 4: Viability Assessment
Plate and culture detached biofilms:
- Perform serial dilutions of the recovery medium and plate onto agar to enumerate colony-forming units (CFU).
- Evaluate MIC:
Determine the MIC as the lowest antimicrobial concentration that completely inhibits visible microbial growth in the recovery medium.
Design, Manufacturing and Consulting – Quality Made in Germany
Hielscher ultrasonicators are well-known for their highest quality and design standards. Robustness and easy operation allow the smooth integration of our ultrasonicators into industrial facilities. Rough conditions and demanding environments are easily handled by Hielscher sonicators.
Hielscher Ultrasonics is an ISO certified company and put special emphasis on high-performance ultrasonicators featuring state-of-the-art technology and user-friendliness. Of course, Hielscher ultrasonicators are CE compliant and meet the requirements of UL, CSA and RoHs.

Streamline sample preparation in 96-well plates and assay plates using the multi-well plate sonicator UIP400MTP
Literature / References
- FactSheet UIP400MTP Multi-well Plate Sonicator – Non-Contact Sonicator – Hielscher Ultrasonics
- Dreyer J., Ricci G., van den Berg J., Bhardwaj V., Funk J., Armstrong C., van Batenburg V., Sine C., VanInsberghe M.A., Marsman R., Mandemaker I.K., di Sanzo S., Costantini J., Manzo S.G., Biran A., Burny C., Völker-Albert M., Groth A., Spencer S.L., van Oudenaarden A., Mattiroli F. (2024): Acute multi-level response to defective de novo chromatin assembly in S-phase. Molecular Cell 2024.
- Mochizuki, Chika; Taketomi, Yoshitaka; Irie, Atsushi; Kano, Kuniyuki; Nagasaki, Yuki; Miki, Yoshimi; Ono, Takashi; Nishito, Yasumasa; Nakajima, Takahiro; Tomabechi, Yuri; Hanada, Kazuharu; Shirouzu, Mikako; Watanabe, Takashi; Hata, Kousuke; Izumi, Yoshihiro; Bamba, Takeshi; Chun, Jerold; Kudo, Kai; Kotani, Ai; Murakami, Makoto (2024): Secreted phospholipase PLA2G12A-driven lysophospholipid signaling via lipolytic modification of extracellular vesicles facilitates pathogenic Th17 differentiation. BioRxiv 2024.
- Cosenza-Contreras M, Seredynska A, Vogele D, Pinter N, Brombacher E, Cueto RF, Dinh TJ, Bernhard P, Rogg M, Liu J, Willems P, Stael S, Huesgen PF, Kuehn EW, Kreutz C, Schell C, Schilling O. (2024): TermineR: Extracting information on endogenous proteolytic processing from shotgun proteomics data. Proteomics. 2024.
- De Oliveira A, Cataneli Pereira V, Pinheiro L, Moraes Riboli DF, Benini Martins K, Ribeiro de Souza da Cunha MDL (2016): Antimicrobial Resistance Profile of Planktonic and Biofilm Cells of Staphylococcus aureus and Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 17(9):1423; 2016.
- Martins KB, Ferreira AM, Pereira VC, Pinheiro L, Oliveira A, Cunha MLRS (2019): In vitro Effects of Antimicrobial Agents on Planktonic and Biofilm Forms of Staphylococcus saprophyticus Isolated From Patients With Urinary Tract Infections. Frontiers in Microbiology 2019.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the MIC Assay?
The Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) assay is a standardized test used to determine the lowest concentration of an antimicrobial agent required to inhibit the visible growth of a microorganism. It is commonly performed using broth microdilution or agar dilution methods, where microorganisms are exposed to serial dilutions of the antimicrobial agent. MIC assays are critical for evaluating antimicrobial efficacy, guiding clinical treatment, and assessing resistance levels in both planktonic and biofilm-associated microorganisms.
What is the Difference between the Biofilm-Based Minimum Inhibitory Concentration Assay and the MBIC Assay?
The biofilm-based Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) assay and the Minimum Biofilm Inhibitory Concentration (MBIC) assay are related but distinct in their purpose and methodology.
The biofilm-based MIC assay evaluates the lowest concentration of an antimicrobial agent needed to inhibit visible biofilm growth or viability, focusing on biofilm-associated cells rather than planktonic bacteria. In contrast, the MBIC assay specifically measures the ability of an antimicrobial agent to prevent biofilm formation, rather than treating pre-formed biofilms. While both assays deal with biofilm-associated bacteria, the biofilm-based MIC assay addresses treatment, and the MBIC assay emphasizes prevention, making them complementary tools for studying antimicrobial efficacy against biofilms.
What Biofilms are Used in MIC Assays?
Microbial biofilms and planktonic cells are both used in Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) assays to study antimicrobial efficacy under different conditions.
- Planktonic Cells:
Planktonic cells are free-floating, single microbial cells that serve as the standard model for traditional MIC assays. Common microorganisms include Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, and Candida albicans. These assays determine the MIC required to inhibit the growth of free-living cells and are critical for initial antimicrobial screening. - Biofilm-Associated Cells:
Biofilm cells are microorganisms embedded in an extracellular matrix, which significantly increases their resistance to antimicrobials. Biofilm MIC assays often include:- Gram-negative bacteria: Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Klebsiella pneumoniae, known for biofilm formation in infections and industrial settings.
- Gram-positive bacteria: Staphylococcus aureus (including MRSA), Staphylococcus epidermidis, and Enterococcus faecalis, commonly implicated in device-related infections.
- Fungi: Candida albicans and related species, important in biofilm-related fungal infections.
- Mixed-species biofilms: These are sometimes used to replicate natural polymicrobial biofilms, such as those found in chronic wounds or industrial biofouling.
By comparing MIC values for planktonic cells and biofilm-associated cells, researchers can assess the enhanced resistance of biofilms and identify agents effective against these more resilient microbial communities.
What is the Difference between MIC and MBEC?
The Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) is the lowest concentration of an antimicrobial agent required to prevent biofilm formation, whereas the Minimum Biofilm Eradication Concentration (MBEC) is the lowest concentration needed to eradicate an established biofilm. MIC focuses on biofilm prevention, while MBEC assesses the treatment efficacy against mature biofilms.
What Plates are commonly used for MBEC Assays?
Microtiter plates commonly used for MBEC assays are typically 96-well plates made from polystyrene or polypropylene. These materials provide a suitable surface for biofilm formation and are chemically resistant to the antimicrobial agents tested during the assay. Polystyrene plates are widely preferred because of their optical clarity, which is advantageous for downstream analyses such as spectrophotometric or fluorescence-based measurements. The design of these plates includes detachable peg lids, which are essential for the assay since biofilms form on the pegs that are immersed in the wells containing growth media. Standardized plates, such as those compliant with the MBEC assay protocol, are specifically engineered to ensure reproducibility and compatibility with the UIP400MTP sonicator or other processing equipment.
What are PEG-Lid Plates?
PEG-lid plates are specialized multi-well plate systems where the lid is equipped with small polyethylene glycol (PEG) pegs or pins extending into each well. These pegs provide a surface for microbial biofilm formation under controlled conditions, mimicking real-world biofilm growth. The design allows biofilms to develop on the pegs while the wells contain growth media or antimicrobial agents, enabling high-throughput testing of biofilm susceptibility to treatments, such as in MBEC, MBIC and MIC assays.
What is the Advantage of Ultrasonic Biofilm Dislodging Compared to Cell Scraping?
Ultrasonic biofilm dislodging offers a significant advantage over cell scraping by providing a non-invasive, uniform, and highly efficient method for removing biofilms from surfaces. Unlike scraping, which can be inconsistent and damage the underlying surface or cells, ultrasonic waves penetrate the biofilm matrix, breaking it apart without compromising the integrity of adjacent structures. This method ensures reproducibility, minimizes contamination risk, and is particularly effective for applications requiring precise biofilm removal, such as in microbiological studies or medical device testing. Read more how the UIP400MTP Sonicator excels cell scraping!

Hielscher Ultrasonics manufactures high-performance ultrasonic homogenizers from lab to industrial size.